Commentary on Sections The Pensions Ombudsman Section 275: Jurisdiction
1112.In the case of Brittanic Asset Management v. the Pensions Ombudsman, the Court of Appeal drew a distinction between a person who undertakes “an act of administration concerned with the scheme” and a person “concerned with the administration of the scheme”. It noted that the former fell outside the Pensions Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. This section provides that the Pensions Ombudsman will be able to investigate complaints involving “one-off” acts of administration.
1113.Subsection (1) inserts a new subsection (4A) into section 146 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993. Under section 146(4), regulations may treat a person who is not a trustee, manager or employer, but who is concerned with the financing or administration of, or the provision of benefits under, a pension scheme as though he were a person responsible for the management of the scheme. Section 146(4A) provides that a person or body of persons is concerned with the administration of a scheme where the person or body is responsible for carrying out an act of administration concerned with the scheme.
1114.Subsection (2) provides that new section 146(4A) will not have retrospective effect and will only apply in relation to disputes and complaints in relation to matters taking place on or after the date the new section 146(4A) comes into force.
1115.Subsection (3) provides that for the purpose of subsection (2), questions in relation to the carrying out of a sole trustee’s functions are to be treated as a “dispute”. This allows them to come within the ambit of subsection (2).