Unfair Relationships
44.Sections 19-22 repeal and replace sections 137-140 of the 1974 Act which empowered the Court to reopen an ‘extortionate credit bargain’. A bargain was ‘extortionate’, if at the time the agreement was made, it required the debtor to make payments which were grossly exorbitant or otherwise grossly contravened ordinary principles of fair dealing. In coming to its conclusions the court was required to consider evidence produced concerning specific factors relevant to prevailing interest rates, the debtor (e.g. age, experience or degree of financial pressure) and creditor (e.g. accepted risk having regard to value of security).
45.The amended provisions will enable a court to consider whether the relationship between the creditor and debtor arising out of that agreement is unfair to the debtor because of the terms of the agreement, the way in which the agreement is operated by the creditor or any other thing done or not done by or on behalf of the creditor before or after the agreement was made. The court may take into account all matters it thinks relevant relating to the creditor and debtor in making its assessment. The court is provided with a broad range of remedies under new section 140B to address the unfairness.