Commentary on Sections Exception 1:
19.Table 1 sets out the cases when consent must be provided expressly, and by whom:
20.The factual concepts behind consent are the same in this Welsh Act as is the case in the 2004 Act and reflect an intentional interplay between the two pieces of legislation. For example, the factual question of whether there is “a decision of a person to consent, or not to consent, to a [transplantation] activity …. in force immediately before his or her death” is the same whether the legal framework is the Welsh legislation or the 2004 Act. In this way, the two pieces of legislation are intended to sit side by side each other.
21.If a person is alive and normally lives, for example, in England and takes part in a transplantation activity in Wales, as a matter of law the Welsh Act applies. However the effect is the same, i.e. that person’s consent is required, as if the 2004 Act applied.
22.If a person who normally lives in Wales dies in England, his or her consent cannot be deemed to have been given to a transplantation activity that takes place in England. The 2004 Act would apply and therefore a person in a qualifying relationship would decide in the absence of express consent. This result is achieved in two ways. The first is that the 2004 Act continues to apply where the transplantation activity takes place in England or Northern Ireland. Secondly under that Act the question of fact relating to whether a decision of the deceased relating to consent (in practice being on the Organ Donor Register) was in force when he or she died is the same.
23.Appointments of representatives nominated to take the decision relating to consent after death made under either the 2004 Act or the Welsh legislation are recognised in a cross border situation. This is done by a provision in both pieces of legislation (section 8(11) of this Act and new section 4(11) of the 2004 Act, to be inserted by an order made by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 150 of the Government of Wales Act 2006) by which appointments made under one Act can be treated as having been made under the other.