Commentary on Sections Part 1 – Assignation Corrections Section 29 – Correction of the assignations record
145.Subsection (1) of this section provides that where a court determines that the assignations record is inaccurate, it must direct the Keeper to correct the record, and may give the Keeper any further direction it considers necessary. The Keeper would be expected to act on that direction (as to do otherwise would risk the Keeper being held in contempt of court). Section 120(1) of the Act sets out that “court” means the Court of Session or the sheriff.
146.The Act does not provide for an express right of appeal against, or a review of, a registration decision by the Keeper. However, an issue relating to the accuracy of the register might be raised in other proceedings, including in a judicial review of such a decision.
	Example 1An assignation document is reduced (i.e. annulled) by the court because it has been forged by one of the purported parties to the document. The court can direct the Keeper to correct the entry in the assignations record.
	Example 2An entry is created in the assignations record for an assignation document granted by P Ltd in favour of Q Ltd. But in the application form for registration of the assignation, Q Ltd erroneously states that Z Ltd is the assignor. Z Ltd could ask the court to correct the entry, although if the inaccuracy is manifest (as is likely) then it might prefer to seek a correction under section 29(2) of the Act (or, if applicable, under any application route that might be introduced under section 32 of the Act).
147.In contrast with subsection (2), the court does not require to determine under subsection (1) whether there is a manifest inaccuracy, or indeed whether what is needed to correct the inaccuracy is manifest. The function of the court as provided for by this subsection is to make a determination, and direct accordingly.
148.Subsection (2) provides that where the Keeper becomes aware of an obvious inaccuracy, the Keeper must correct the assignations record provided that what is needed to correct the inaccuracy is also obvious. If the correction needed is not obvious, then the Keeper must instead note the inaccuracy on the entry in question. This duty does not cover where the Keeper becomes aware of the inaccuracy by way of a direction given by the court, as that situation is already dealt with by subsection (1).
149.Subsection (3) sets out what is meant by an “inaccuracy”. It provides that there is an inaccuracy in the assignations record where the information that an entry is to comprise of is inaccurate or complete, an entry does not include a copy of the assignation document (or includes such a copy but the document is invalid), or an entry has been incorrectly removed from the record.
150.Subsection (4) sets out what a correction of the assignations record may involve.
151.Subsection (5) sets out that a correction is taken to be made at the date and time entered in the RoA for the correction. This is particularly important as regards section 27(3) of the Act, under which an ineffective registration may be made effective by a correction, with the result that the claim will transfer (provided that the other requirements under section 3 are also met).