Part 2: Serious Disruption Prevention Orders Section 23: Requirements in serious disruption prevention order
Subsection (1) provides that, where a SDPO imposes a requirement on a person (other than a notification requirement as set out in section 24), the order must name someone responsible for supervising compliance with the requirement.
	Subsection (2) specifies that the supervisory person may be an individual or an organisation.
	Subsection (3) sets out that the court must receive evidence about the suitability and enforceability of any requirements before they are imposed from the supervisory person or organisation.
	Subsection (4) ensures the court assesses whether multiple requirements are compatible with one another before imposing them.
	Subsection (5) establishes the duties for the supervisory person from subsection (1). This person must make any necessary arrangements in connection with the requirements they are responsible for, promote the person’s compliance with them, and inform the relevant chief officer of police if the person has complied or not complied with the relevant requirements.
	Subsection (6) specifies that the relevant chief officer of police referenced in subsection (5) is either the chief police officer for the police area which it appears to the supervisory person the person subject to the SDPO lives in, or if it appears to the supervisory person that the person subject to the SDPO lives in more than one police area, whichever chief police officer of those areas that person think it is most appropriate to inform.
	Subsection (7) specifies that where the person is subject to a SDPO requirement, other than a notification requirement under section 24, they must keep in touch with the supervisory person and notify them of any change in their home address.
	Subsection (8) provides that subsection (7) applies to an individual subject to a SDPO as if it were a requirement of the order (as such, failure to comply without reasonable excuse will be an offence under Section 27).