Part 7: Bulk personal dataset warrants Section 210: Failure to approve specific BPD warrant issued in urgent case
This section explains the process if a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a specific BPD warrant that was issued under the urgency procedure above. Subsection (2) states that anything being done under that warrant should stop as soon as possible. Subsection (3) explains that if a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the warrant, he or she may determine what may be done with the material that was retained under that warrant. He or she may direct that the material is destroyed or impose conditions as to the use or retention of any of the material.
	Subsections (4) and (5) explain that the Judicial Commissioner can require representations from either the intelligence service or the Secretary of State, and must have regard to any representations received by these parties, before deciding what to do with the material. Subsections (6) and (7) explain that an appeal can be made to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner.
	Subsection (8) makes clear that an intelligence service is not in breach of the requirement for a warrant under subsections (1) and (2) of section 200 if it retains or examines a bulk personal dataset as a result of directions allowing this made by the Judicial Commissioner under subsection (3)(b). Subsection (9) makes it clear that nothing in this section or section 209 affects the lawfulness of actions taken in reliance on a warrant before it ceases to have effect or at the point it ceases to have effect and which cannot reasonably be stopped.