The Act Offences of stirring up hatred Section 4 – Offences of stirring up hatred
34.Section 4 creates two offences of stirring up hatred. It should be read in conjunction with section 9 of the Act (see paragraphs 57 – 65).
35.Section 4(1)(a) and (b) creates an offence of stirring up racial hatred. It provides that it is an offence for a person to behave in a manner that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening, abusive or insulting, or to communicate to another person material that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening, abusive or insulting, either with the intention to stir up hatred against a group of persons based on the group being defined by reference to race, colour, nationality (including citizenship), or ethnic or national origins, or in circumstances where a reasonable person would consider the behaviour or the communication of the material to be likely to result in hatred being be stirred up against such a group.
36.The phrase “a reasonable person would consider” in section 4(1)(a)(i) and (ii) makes it clear that an objective standard is to be applied as to whether the behaviour and material referred to is threatening, abusive or insulting. Similarly, the same phrase in section 4(1)(b)(ii) makes it clear that an objective standard is to be applied as to whether the behaviour or communication of material referred to is likely to result in hatred being stirred up against a group defined by reference to race, colour, nationality (including citizenship), or ethnic or national origins.
37.Section 4(2)(a) and (b) creates an offence of stirring up hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to certain characteristics. The characteristics to which this offence applies are listed in section 4(3) (discussed below). It provides that it is an offence for a person to behave in a manner that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive, or to communicate to another person material that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive, with the intention to stir up hatred against a group of persons based on the group being defined by reference to one of the listed characteristics. The phrase “a reasonable person would consider” in section 4(2)(a)(i) and (ii) makes it clear that an objective standard is to be applied as to whether the behaviour or material referred to is threatening or abusive.
38.Section 4(3) lists the characteristics by which a group may be defined, in respect of which it is an offence to stir up hatred. These are: age; disability; religion or, in the case of a social or cultural group, perceived religious affiliation; sexual orientation; transgender identity; and variations in sex characteristics.
39.Section 4(4) provides that it is a defence to an offence under section 4(1) or (2) for the accused to show that the behaviour or the communication was, in the particular circumstances, reasonable. This may apply where, for example, a person communicates a threat of serious violence made by someone else for the purpose of alerting a journalist or a journalist reporting a threat of serious violence made by another person.
40.Section 4(5) provides that, for the purposes of the operation of the reasonableness defence in section 4(4), the court should have particular regard to the importance of the right to freedom of expression in determining whether behaviour or communication of material was reasonable. The right to freedom of expression by virtue of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is referred to in section 4(5), includes the general principle that the right applies to the expression of information or ideas that offend, shock or disturb. In particular, Article 10.1 of the Convention states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.”. But this right is subject to Article 10.2 which states that “The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”.
41.Section 4(6) provides that, for the purposes of the defence in subsection (4), the accused is subject to an evidential burden of proof to bring forward enough evidence to raise an issue with respect to the defence. The legal burden of disproving the defence and proving that the offence has been committed remains with the prosecution.
42.Section 4(7)(a) makes it clear that a person’s behaviour for the purpose of section 4(1)(a)(i) and (2)(a)(i) includes behaviour of any kind and, in particular, things said (therefore the spoken word, unrecorded speech) or otherwise communicated (e.g. displaying a poster, placard or banner; the printed media on the internet through websites, email, blogs, podcasts etc.), as well as things done by the person.
43.Section 4(7)(b) also provides that, for the purpose of that section, the person’s behaviour may consist of a single act or a course of conduct.
44.Section 4(8) defines the different ways in which a person may communicate material to another person for the purposes of an offence under section 4. The different ways in which a person may communicate material to another person are by:
	Displaying, publishing or distributing the material e.g. on a sign; on the internet through websites, blogs, podcasts, social media etc., either directly, or by forwarding or repeating material that originates from a third party; through printed media such as magazine publications or leaflets, etc.
	Giving, sending, showing or playing the material to another person e.g. through online streaming, by email, playing a video, through public performance of a play, etc.
	Making the material available to another person in any way e.g. through the spoken word, the written word, electronic communications, etc. either directly (as the originator of the material), or by forwarding or repeating the material.
45.Section 4(9) provides for the available maximum penalties for an offence under section 4(1) and (2).