Part 10: Management of offenders Chapter 5: Football banning Orders Section 192: Football banning orders: requirement to make order on conviction etc
Subsection (1) amends the test in section 14A of the 1989 Act under which a court may impose a banning order on an individual convicted of a relevant football related offence (as defined in Schedule 1 to that Act). New section 14A(2) sets out that the court must make a banning order in respect of the offender unless it considers that there are particular circumstances relating to the offence or to the offender which would make it unjust in all the circumstances to do so. Where the court does not make a banning order, it must state in open court the reasons for not doing so, under section 14A(3).
	Subsections (2) to (4) make equivalent amendment to section 22 of the 1989 Act (banning orders arising out of offences outside England and Wales). Section 22 provides the courts with the power to impose a banning order on persons convicted of an offence in a country or territory outside England and Wales if that offence has been specified in an Order in Council as corresponding to an offence in Schedule 1 to the 1989 Act. The new subsections (4) and (5) provide that a court must make a banning order in respect of an offender convicted of a corresponding offence overseas unless the conviction is the subject of legal proceedings in that country questioning the conviction, or the court considers that there are particular circumstances relating to the offence or to the person which would make it unjust to make a banning order in all the circumstances. If the court decides not to make a banning order on these grounds, it must state in open court the reasons for not doing so, per new subsection (5A).
	Subsection (5) provides that this section does not apply in relation to offences committed before the provision comes into force.