Commentary on Sections Part 2 – Security over Moveable Property Corrections Section 100 – Correction of the statutory pledges record at instance of the court or the Keeper
424.This section deals with corrections which do not emanate from an application for a correction.
425.Subsection (1) ensures that the courts can (where appropriate) direct the Keeper to correct an entry in the RSP. The Keeper would be required to comply with any direction, as to do otherwise would risk the Keeper being found to be in contempt of court.
426.Court proceedings might arise in a number of ways. The Act does not provide for an express right of appeal against, or review of, any decision by the Keeper. However, an issue relating to the accuracy of the register might be raised in other proceedings, such as a judicial review of a decision by the Keeper, or proceedings in which it is alleged that a constitutive document is a forgery. The Keeper can, if desired, enter the court process (see section 103 of the Act).
	Example 1A constitutive document is reduced by the court because it has been forged by one of the apparent parties. The court can direct the Keeper to correct the entry in the statutory pledges record.
	Example 2An entry has been created in the statutory pledges record for a security by Andrew in favour of Bruce. But in the application form for registration of the assignation, Bruce erroneously states that Carol is the creditor. Carol could seek removal of the entry by the court (as an alternative to a demand for a correction).
427.Subsection (2) of this section sets out circumstances in which the Keeper will (under subsection (3)) be required to take action upon becoming aware of a manifest inaccuracy in the statutory pledges record. Subsection (3) will not apply where—
	that awareness comes from a court direction (as the matter will be dealt with under subsection (1))
	that awareness comes from an application having been made (as the matter will be dealt with under the application process), or
	the Keeper considers that the appropriate way of addressing the inaccuracy is to make an application (as the matter would then be dealt with under the application process) – but only where the inaccuracy is not the Keeper’s fault.
428.As such, if the inaccuracy is something that has been introduced by the Keeper then it is not open to the Keeper to redirect parties to the application route. However, an inaccuracy would not be attributable to the Keeper simply because the Keeper has taken information from an application and entered it on the register.
429.Where the Keeper becomes aware of such an inaccuracy, other than in the cases set out above, subsection (3) requires the Keeper to correct the manifest inaccuracy where what is needed to correct the inaccuracy is also manifest and to note any inaccuracy that cannot be corrected.
430.See also section 102, which sets out the procedure that the Keeper must follow, depending upon the nature of the correction being made (though in every case, the Keeper must note in the register that a correction has been made). That section also provides for notification to be given to interested parties of the entry having been corrected.