The competition framework Part 4: Competition Reform Investigation powers Section 40: Civil enforcement of investigation powers
324.This section substitutes civil sanctions for the current criminal sanctions available to the CMA for failures to comply with investigations.
325.The intention of allowing civil sanctions is to provide a more effective deterrent to failing to co-operate with an investigation. Bringing criminal cases can be complex, costly and time-consuming for an enforcer.
326.Subsection (2) inserts new sections 40A and 40B into the CA 1998. These sections create a system of civil penalties for failing to comply with investigations which is similar to the system of civil penalties for failing to comply with merger investigations under the EA 2002.
327.New section 40A sets out the civil penalties for failure to comply with requirements. As with section 111 of the EA 2002 (which concerns the merger regime), a penalty may take the form of a fixed financial penalty, a daily penalty which increases with the delay in complying with the requirement concerned, or a combination of the two. The maximum amount for such penalties is to be determined in an order made by the Secretary of State and cannot exceed £30,000 (for a fixed penalty) or £15,000 per day (for a daily penalty). This is the same as in the EA 2002 for failing to comply with merger investigations. Section 40A(6) and (7) set out what days should be included in determining the daily rate. The requirement under section 40A(8) to consult on the cap on monetary penalties mirrors a similar requirement under the EA 2002.
328.Subsection (9) of the new section 40A provides that sections 112 to 115 of the EA 2002 apply in relation to a penalty under this section as they apply to a penalty under section 110(1) of that Act, which concerns failure to comply with a notice concerning attendance of witnesses and production of documents etc. Sections 112 to 115 of the EA 2002 set out the procedural requirements for the CMA to give notice when it will apply a monetary penalty, the system for payments and interest by instalments and the right for a full merits appeal to the CAT for parties who are required to pay a monetary penalty. A party can appeal where it is aggrieved by the imposition of the penalty, the amount of the penalty, or the date by which the penalty is required to be paid. The requirement to pay a penalty is suspended until the case is determined. The CAT may cancel or reduce (not increase) the penalty or amend the date or dates by which penalties have to be paid.
329.Section 40B is similar to section 116 of the EA 2002. It requires the CMA(5) to consult on and then to publish a statement of policy in relation to the use of its powers under section 40A. This statement of policy will include the considerations that will be relevant to determining the nature and amount of any monetary penalty. These considerations will be for the CMA to identify, but it is envisaged that they could include:
	the nature and gravity of the omission;
	the size and financial resources of the defaulter;
	the size of penalty that will encourage the party to co-operate; and
	the scale of costs and other disbenefits that will be incurred by the CMA if an inquiry has to be extended to take account of information provided late.
330.Subsections (3) to (6) amend section 38 of the CA 1998. These amendments ensure that the rules for guidance on penalties under section 36 of the CA 1998 for infringements of the anti-trust prohibitions do not extend to cover the monetary penalties imposed under section 40A of that Act.
331.Subsections (7) to (9) repeal the criminal offence for not complying with a criminal investigation in the areas subject to civil penalties under the new section 40A. Intentionally obstructing an investigating officer remains a criminal offence. The penalty for this offence is a fine, imprisonment or both.